Analysing The United States Presidential Election Of 1916 Politics Essay

Analysing The fall in States presidential Election Of 1916 Politics EssayAn election, to ab issue, is a suffrage taken to determine who and what caller will hold office for the organisation activity in question for a set term. Though this is accurate, an election is as nearly as a reflection of non only the government and the people to which that government put ups, plainly in fact the entire world at that measure. The course of instruction of 1916 was one of optimism, electric resistance, nativism, womens rights, allies, central powers, trenches, progressivism, isolationism and a great deal of tribealism. The Great struggle had started two eld prior and a small amount of opposite serious conflicts much(prenominal) as Easter Rising, the Arab revolt against the Ottoman Turks and the Mexican Revolution had begun to take place as well. The superjacent to the presidency had nominate his first Jewish Supreme Court Justice, Louis Brandeis, and the US had invaded Cuba for the third sentence due to the corruption of the Menocal regime. 1916 to a fault presented many achievements in a miscellany of subjects the rise of Charlie Chaplin the first successful blood transfusion the invention of the glitter switch the creation of the Boy Scouts the beginning of Boeing Aviation approval by to a greater extent states of womens suffrage Coca-Colas introduction to the market of the current coke recipe the founding of the San Diego Zoo the presentation of Albert Einsteins Theory of General Relativity, and the cancellation of the Summer exceptional Games in Berlin, Germany. Although such details may seem insignificant, no era ever lived in should be forgotten or secluded from that of the rest. primary coil issues, political parties, nominations, elections and results do well to reflect this great time in memorial and its impact on the US as a nation but just as well should we remember the world as it was.The most predominant factor affecting the world at that time was WWI, or as it was called back then, The Great fight. The war had started two eld prior to this election and had cause so much turmoil within europium that the American people where simply dodging the inevitable. The Great War was only an arms travel of one alliance against the opposite. The first alliance was called the triad Entente, in any case called Allies, which consisted, at that time, of Great Britain, France, Italy, Russia, Ireland, Portugal, Serbia, Romania and Greece. The second alliance was called the Triple alliance, also called underlying Powers, and consisted of Germany, Austria-Hungary, Turkey, Bulgaria and the entire Ottoman Empire. The conflicting alliances disturbed the American peoples with ethnicity, trade and moral dilemmas. German-Americans as well as the other Central Power country-related Americans had only begun to experience alienation because of the war, but the effect as well as their ties to lieu became a problem in futurity g overnment involvement. Also, the Americans were supplying both(prenominal) sides. Ford Motor Company, for instance, was supplying the Germans with machine parts. This, as well as moral conflicts from hearsay about the war, such as the sinking of the RMS LUSITANIA, had much of the United States in conflict. Still, much of the U.S was utterly adamant towards its isolationist stance on the war.Unfortunately the Great War was non the only problem present in the world in that form. In fact, such conflicts as the Easter Rising in Ireland and the Mexican Revolution also had an impact on many Americans just as easily. Easter Rising was, at the time, the biggest rebellion effort against the British reign over over Ireland that had occurred since the rebellion of 1798. To some, it may seem that it was also the spark of what the ire would later become as well as over 90 years of bloodshed between the IRA and the British. Though most of the vigilance of the U.S. was centered on the Grea t War, the uprising in Ireland was most for sure not a missed subject during this time, and most certainly not ignored by the majority of Irish Americans. The Mexican Revolution, however, had a more direct impact on the American people due to its law of proximity to the U.S. A revolution by a man named Francisco Madero led to attempts by Pancho Villa to reclaim lands lost to the US years before. Pancho Villa then invaded New Mexico cleansing 12 U.S soldiers and instigated retaliation from the United States government as wished. Though an invasion, Pancho Villas efforts, however, were notwithstanding used for tricking the US into intervening in the revolution by dash of invasion themselves as a way of insuring that Villas preferred candidate would place exulting. Even more than our involvement, were two questions how to protect the economic interests we had in Mexico during Tafts administration, and, steady more largely, how was this an act of neutrality. Much of the US was u ncertain, by this point, of Wilsons capability of dealings with foreign affairs, which had a significant effect on the election as well.The year of 1916 was also an election year. The two primary parties were the Re manans and the Democrats. Minor parties, consisted of the Prohibitionists, collectiviseds, Socialist aim Party and the Progressives. The Republicans of this time were seeking more breastplate on individual rights, restriction in foreign affairs involvement, increases in industry, protection of free enterprise, good education and the right of states to determine womens suffrage. The Democrats, however, were endorsing Wilsons former achievements as the incumbent military preparedness, a world association of nations to maintain heartsease after the war in Europe had ended, Pan-American unity, a ban on child labor, womens suffrage, and prison reform. Third parties, for the most part, remained more exclusive on which subjects they found most interesting. The Prohibitionis ts still kept their focus on the inhibition of alcohol its main goal being temperance. The Progressives as well as the Socialists remained determined on excessive government change and inspiration for total movements to support the people. Lastly, the Socialist Labor party had kept its get words most seemingly towards labor modifications.Most parties were in agreement on who would represent what. The Democrats without opposition renominated Wilson and invited Thomas R. Marshall to be his legislatening correspond at the parliamentary National Convention in St. Louis, Missouri from June 14th to June 16th. The Prohibitionist party held their convention in St. Paul, Minnesota from June 19th to June 21st and nominated crowd Franklin Hanly as death chair and Ira Landrith as his running mate. The Socialist Labor Party nominated rusehur Reimer as president and Caleb Harrison as his running mate in their convention in New York City, New York on April twenty-ninth to May 3rd. The Pr ogressives were the same in accordance to their nomination of former president Theodore Roosevelt, but Roosevelt turned down his nomination, thus removing the party from the race and pull former progressives in all directions. Roosevelt endorsed the Republican Partys nominated member chop-chop thereafter. The Republicans had many candidates in question, but the most prominent was a traditionalist Senator named Elihu Root from New York, and a liberal Senator named John W. Weeks from Massachusetts. The partys bosses on the other hand saw that a balance between the two would be more substantial for both ends of the party and result in a once again unified party. It was then, that Supreme Court Justice Charles Evans Hughes was brought into the race without former interest and won on the third ballot, with former wickedness president Charles W. Fairbanks as his vice presidential nominee. The Socialists, due to Eugene V. Debs decline to the ticket, did not hold a formal convention. A referendum of the partys members nominated Allan L. Benson, an anti-war activist, for president and George Ross Kirkpatrick as his running mate in hopes of a better chance at the presidency.Due to best-selling(predicate)ity, precedent, and the incumbent himself, the two primary parties that ran against each other were the Democrats and Republicans. chairsomebody Wilson, running on the Democratic ticket, came into the 1916 contest with a list of interior(prenominal) accomplishments, but the race was dominated by foreign affairs and the ongoing world war in Europe. The Democratic Party itself was running most of the campaign on the slogan He Kept Us out of War. Ironically enough, Wilson did not like the slogan due to his doubtfulness in his capability to keep the US out of conflicts with such an uncertain future. Hughes, on the other hand, did not have the advantage of being the incumbent and used his efforts to suppress Wilsons attempt to p lease neutrality, as well as his views on labor laws that suppressed businesses and profit. On one hand, the Republican party held militarists, who criticized Wilsons unclouded foreign policies with Mexico and Germany, but also pro-Germans or pacifists, who simply denounced Wilsons policies for fear they capability lead to war. Hughes was not exact on either approach, but was expeditious in his attempt to defeat Wilson. Though both Wilson and Hughes had a more often than not similar outlook on the war, Hughes efforts seemed to have been skewed mostly by his own party. Theodore Roosevelt, who had split the party in the previous election, was now bragging(a) his endorsements to the Republican Party. Even though he was resentful for his lack of nomination in the party, he felt it was best to support them in do to oppose his most hated Wilson. Roosevelt held many speeches in an effort to support Hughes, but ended up leading a pro-war campaign that did secret code less than upset the majority of the US population and i ts absolute view on isolationism as well as alienating others. Nearing the end of the election, there was a minor issue in atomic number 20 pertaining to Hughes was slight of both Senator Hiram Johnson and the California Labor Unions. In spite of this, however, most of the American public believed that Hughes was most certainly going to win the election anyway. Results in November, as well, made the election one of the closest in history. Hughes took an early lead in the eastern and mid- westerly states but Wilson persevered and found himself in the lead with the western and southern votes. Wilson took 30 states for 277 electoral votes, while Hughes won 18 states and 254 electoral votes. Although still narrow, Wilson had also won the popular vote, taking 49% of the popular vote to Hughes 46%. The remaining five percent went to the third parties, going away a 4% split between the Prohibitionists and Socialists. Voter turnout reached a high of 62%, and would not be matched for anothe r 24 years until Franklin Delano Roosevelt ran for a third term in 1940. Also, the 11 states that had already sanctioned womens suffrage played a great role in the election, as all but one state voted for Wilson. If Hughes had carried California and its 13 electoral votes, he would have won the election. This made the incident in California seem to be the cause which may have very well cost him the election.In account of the election, we also see differences and similarities between quondam(prenominal) and present elections that allow us to compare and contrast our histories. Vice President Thomas Marshall was the first vice president elected to a second term since John C. Calhoun in the election of 1828. Woodrow Wilson was the only person other than James Knox Polk to win a presidential election but not win his home and birth state. His popular vote circumference of 3.1% was also the smallest percentage margin in history for a victorious sitting President until the 2004 election, in which George W. Bush produced a margin of 2.4%. Wilson is also the only president in U.S. history to win re-election with fewer electoral votes than in his first election. However, Wilson is not the only President to win re-election with a overthrow percentage of the electoral vote in his second election than in his first election. The other president was James Madison, who although had a lower percentage, did have a lower electoral vote total. The election in general also has a distinct relevance to the 2004 election. Wilson, like Bush, was the incumbent president running for a second term whose only previous experience in a political office was as his home states governor. Though one ran on a strong war show up and the other on keeping out of the war, Wilson and Bush had both run on their previous presidencys involvement in war. Both were keen on their domestic involvement, however Bush wanted less taxes and Wilson wished for a sore graduated federal income tax. Though diff erent, there is most evidently a distinct connection between this election and others that has and will remain most important to our nations history. Mark Twain stated the importance of ones past sooner well, History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme.Written By Carlynn FergusonResourcesHicks, J.D. (1941). The American nation a history of the united states from 1865 to the present. Cambridge, MA, U.S.A The Riverside Press.Richardson, D.B. (n.d.).CB Presidential interrogation Services, . (2009). Allan benson. Retrieved from http//www.presidentsusa.net/albenson.htmlMount, S. (2007, February 20). Electoral vote 1916 election. Retrieved from http//www.usconstitution.net/ev_1916.htmlWoodrow Wilson. (2009). In Encyclopdia Britannica. Retrieved December 10, 2009, from Encyclopdia Britannica Online http//www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/644766/Woodrow-WilsonElection of 1916. (n.d.). Retrieved from http//www.u-s-history.com/pages/h888.htmlUnited states presidential election, 1916. (n.d.). Retrieved from http//www.viswiki.com/en/United_States_presidential_election,_1916United states presidential election, 1916. (n.d.). Retrieved from http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1916Peters, G. (1999). The American presidency project. Retrieved from http//www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pelvic inflammatory disease=29591Electoral college 1916. (n.d.). Retrieved from http//www.knowledgerush.com/wiki_image/b/bd/ElectoralCollege1916-Large.pngMiller, D. (2005). 1916 timeline. Retrieved from http//din-timelines.com/1916_timeline.shtmlLegacy america. (n.d.). Retrieved from http//www.legacyamericana.com/servlet/the-Presidential-Candidates-cln-Charles-E.-Hughes/Categoriescharles evans hughes. (n.d.). Retrieved from http//www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Charles_Evans_Hughes(n.d.). Retrieved from http//wps.ablongman.com/wps/media/objects/1483/1518969/DIVI508.jpg(n.d.). Retrieved from http//legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Prohibition+Party( n.d.). Retrieved from http//www.wisconsinhistory.org/museum/exhibits/elections/images/1916_antiWilsonToon56962.jpg(n.d.). Retrieved from http//www.corbisimages.com/images/U42650INP.jpg?size=67uid=31107087-C729-48D8-AE0E-F24913B92735Art Antiques Online Auction, Initials. (2003, January). Retrieved from http//www.aspireauctions.com/auction13/details/1650.htmlLast Finegold-Sachs., D.C. (2005). Dcs political report. Retrieved from http//www.dcpoliticalreport.com/members/1988/pres16.htm(n.d.). Retrieved from http//paw.princeton.edu/issues/2008/09/24/pages/2698/PoliticalCartoon6.jpgWoolley, J, Peters, G. (1999). The American presidency project. Retrieved from http//www.presidency.ucsb.edu/showelection.php?year=1916Mia early american marxism socialist party of america history page. (n.d.). Retrieved from http//www.marxists.org/history/usa/eam/spa/socialistparty.htmlSmyth, M. (2004, October 22). 2004 as the bizzaro election of 1916. Retrieved from http//www.centerforpolitics.org/crystal ball/article.php?id=MVS2004102201Wilson re-elected in 1916 an the wwi. (n.d.). Retrieved from http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCNfvC_8324(n.d.). Retrieved from http//en.citizendium.org/images/thumb/4/4a/1916vote.jpg/550px-1916vote.jpg